skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 51664 Find in a Library
Title: ADMINISTRATIVE VERSUS JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION OF MINOR TRAFFIC AND PARKING VIOLATIONS - PROGRAM EVALUATION
Author(s): Y E ZARUR
Date Published: 1974
Page Count: 276
Sponsoring Agency: UMI Dissertation Services
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
Sale Source: UMI Dissertation Services
300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
United States of America
Type: Thesis/Dissertation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: THE EXTENT TO WHICH TRANSFERRING JURISDICTION OVER MINOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES IN NEW YORK CITY FROM CRIMINAL COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES HAS IMPROVED THE ADJUDICATION PROCESS WAS STUDIED THROUGH INTERVIEWS AND A SURVEY.
Abstract: ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF MINOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES (E.G., TAILGATING, USE OF DEFECTIVE CARS, ILLEGAL PARKING) IS MORE PROMPT AND ECONOMICAL AND MORE EFFECTIVE FOR RELIEVING COURT CONGESTION THAN IS ADJUDICATION IN TRAFFIC COURT. TO RECONSTRUCT THE ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF THE TRAFFIC COURT THREE SETS OF INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED. THE RESPONDENTS WERE PRESENT MEMBERS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION BUREAU (AAB) AND OF THE PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU (PVB), AND INFORMED PRIVATE CITIZENS. QUESTIONNAIRES WERE GIVEN TO 100 NEW YORK CITY MOTORISTS FAMILIAR WITH THE OLD AND NEW SYSTEMS, WITH 31 PERCENT RESPONDING, AND TO 92 CRIMINAL COURT JUDGES WITH 21.7 PERCENT RESPONDING, TO DETERMINE THEIR OPINIONS REGARDING THE TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION. QUESTIONNAIRES WERE ALSO GIVEN TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE EXAMINERS TO LEARN THEIR OPINION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE VARIOUS BUREAU PROCEDURES. THE INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONNAIRE DATA WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE FINDINGS OF OTHER SOURCES INCLUDING THOSE FOUND IN LITERATURE REVIEW, AND SUPPORTED THE CONCLUSION THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF MINOR OFFENSES IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION. THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRAFFIC COURT SYSTEM AND OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM IS PRESENTED WITH AN EVALUATION OF THE RESPECTIVE SYSTEMS IN THEIR CAPABILITY FOR THE FAIR AND RAPID ADJUDICATION OF CASES. BOTH THE AAB AND THE PVB ARE CHARACTERIZED BY RELATIVE INFORMALITY CONTRASTED WITH THE COURTS. BY HANDLING MINOR OFFENSES, THE AGENCIES FREE THE COURT SYSTEM TO CONCENTRATE ON MORE SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES AND MAKE THE COURTS MORE RESPONSIVE TO THE PUBLIC NEEDS. FULL-TIME CIVIL SERVICE RATHER THAN PERDIEM HEARING EXAMINERS ARE RECOMMENDED. APPENDED MATERIALS INCLUDE THE THREE SURVEY INSTRUMENTS, SUPPORTING DATA, AND A LIST OF THE PARKING OFFENSES, MINOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES, AND CRIMINAL TRAFFIC CRIMES ADJUDICATED IN NEW YORK STATE. A BIBLIOGRAPHY IS PROVIDED. (TWK)
Index Term(s): Evaluation; New York; Public administration; Questionnaires; Surveys; Traffic courts
Note: STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY - DOCTORAL DISSERTATION
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=51664

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.