skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 51958 Find in a Library
Title: DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION PLAN FOR PUBLIC LAW 94-142 (FROM EVALUATING FEDERALLY SPONSORED PROGRAMS, 1978, BY CHARLOTTE C RENTZ AND R ROBERT RENTZ - SEE NCJ-51956)
Author(s): M M KENNEDY
Corporate Author: Jossey-Bass Publishers
United States of America
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Jossey-Bass Publishers
San Francisco, CA 94103-1741
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A CASE STUDY ILLUSTRATES WAYS THE PLANNING PROCESS FOR EVALUATION CAN BE USED TO CLARIFY THE QUESTIONS TO BE ASKED, THE APPROPRIATE METHODOLOGIES TO BE USED, AND THE TYPES OF DATA WHICH WILL BE OF VALUE.
Abstract: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION PLAN FOR THE EDUCATION FOR ALL HANDICAPPED CHILDREN ACT OF 1975 IS TRACED. DURING THE 2 YEARS BEFORE THE ACT TOOK EFFECT IN 1977, THE BUREAU OF EDUCATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED IN THE U.S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION DEVELOPED STRATEGIES FOR BOTH THE IMPLEMENTATION AND THE EVALUATION OF ITS PROVISIONS. THE THE ACT WAS QUITE COMPLEX AND INVOLVED COOPERATION BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL AGENCIES, WITH THE STATE DESIGNATED AS THE PRIMARY PROVIDER OF EDUCATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED. THREE TYPES OF PLANNING STRATEGY WERE USED: ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION NEEDS, CONSULTATION WITH BOTH STATE OFFICIALS AND VARIOUS POTENTIAL USERS OF THE EVALUATION RESULTS, AND REVIEWS OF PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS, OF FEDERAL EDUCATION LEGISLATION. ACTIVITIES IN EACH OF THESE AREAS ARE DESCRIBED. IT IS POINTED OUT THAT CONSULTATION WITH POTENTIAL USERS OF THE DATA GAVE FRESH INSIGHTS AND HELPED TO MAKE THE ULTIMATE EVALUATION MORE USEFUL. SINCE PLANNING FOR EVALUATION BEGAN AT THE SAME TIME AS PLANNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE COLLECTION OF DATA BY STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES. IT ALSO GAVE AGENCIES TIME TO COLLECT BASE DATA FOR LONGITUDINAL STUDIES. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FLEXIBLE AND QUICK REPORTING SYSTEM TO ENSURE USE OF THE DATA IS ALSO DESCRIBED. LESSONS LEARNED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS PLANNING ARE SUMMARIZED. A TABLE ILLUSTRATES HOW PLANNERS ANALYZED INFORMATION NEEDS. (GLR)
Index Term(s): Education; Evaluation; Evaluation techniques; Laws and Statutes; Planning
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=51958

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.