skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 52313 Find in a Library
Title: USE AND ABUSE OF THE PSYCHIATRIC WITNESS
Journal: ON PATROL IN MANITOBA  Volume:5, 3  Dated:(FALL 1978)  Pages:4-7
Author(s): A I MALCOLM
Corporate Author: Manitoba Police Cmssn
Canada
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 4
Sponsoring Agency: Manitoba Police Cmssn
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: THE USE OF THE PSYCHIATRIC WITNESS IN COURT ONLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE SENTENCING OF AN OFFENDER ALREADY FOUND GUILTY OF SOME CRIMINAL ACT OF OMISSION IS DISCUSSED.
Abstract: THE TASK OF THE EXPERT WITNESS IS DIFFICULT, PARTICULARLY IN MURDER CASES AND IN CASES WHERE THE DEFENSE ARGUES THAT HIS OR HER CLIENT IS NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY. ACCORDING TO THE M'NAGHTEN RULES, APPLIED IN CANADA, IT HAS TO BE CLEARLY PROVEN THAT THE ACCUSED WAS SUFFERING FROM A DEFECT IN REASON WITH REGARD TO CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ACT COMMITTED. A DECISION IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RESULTED IN A NEW TEST OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BY FACILITATING THE FURTHER ADVANCE OF THE SCIENTIST OR EXPERT WITNESS INTO THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL LAW. THE JUDGE STATED THAT COURTS HAVE ASSUMED AN IMPOSSIBLE ROLE IN ATTEMPTING TO DEFINE INSANITY IN TERMS OF A SYMPTOM SUCH AS AN IRRESISTABLE IMPULSE OR MORAL KNOWLEDGE. ACCORDING TO THE NEW TEST, AN ACCUSED PERSON IS NOT CRIMINALLY RESPONSIBLE IF THE UNLAWFUL ACT WAS THE PRODUCT OF A MENTAL DISEASE OR MENTAL DEFECT. THIS TEST HAS BROADENED THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL INQUIRY AND IT HAS GIVEN THE EXPERT PSYCHIATRIC WITNESS CONSIDERABLY MORE AUTHORITY. THE EXPERT PSYCHIATRIC WITNESS INVARIABLY TENDS TO SPEAK TO THE QUESTION OF THE PRESENCE OF MENS REA AND NOT TO THE ACT. SUCH WITNESSES ARE DISINCLINED TO FAVOR PUNITIVE ACTIONS AND TEND TO REGARD THEMSELVES AS HUMANITARIAN. CERTAIN NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS DO RENDER A PERSON INCAPABLE OF KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG. THESE CONDITIONS ARE RARE, HOWEVER, AND CAN ORDINARILY BE DIAGNOSED BY ANY COMPETENT TEAM OF PSYCHIATRISTS AND NEUROLOGISTS. PSYCHIATRISTS ARE FREQUENTLY CALLED ON TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THREE DIFFERENT MATTERS: COMPETENCY OF AN ACCUSED PERSON TO STAND TRIAL, PROVISION OF ADVICE TO THE COURT CONCERNING WHETHER AN INSANE PERSON IS ACCOUNTABLE TO THE LAW, AND DANGEROUSNESS. THE OBJECTIVITY OF EXPERT PSYCHIATRIC WITNESSES IS ADDRESSED. (DEP)
Index Term(s): Competency to stand trial; Defendants; Expert witnesses; Insanity defense; Judicial decisions; Mentally ill offenders; Psychiatry
Note: ARTICLE PREVIOUSLY APPEARED IN CANADIAN POLICE COLLEGE JOURNAL, V 1, N 2 (AUTUMN 1977)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=52313

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.