NCJ Number: 61200
Title: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF 200 EVALUATIONS ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Author(s): V M BIER; E H KAPLAN; C MATTINGLY; T J ECKELS; N REICHMAN
Corporate Author: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Project Director: L S BERLINER; R LARSON
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 110
Sponsoring Agency: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Grant Number: 78-NI-AX-0007
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
Document: PDF
Type: Best Practice/State-of-the-Art Review
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: ANALYSIS OF 200 CRIMINAL JUSTICE EVALUATIONS PERFORMED FROM THE LATE 1960'S TO 1977 REVEALS THAT QUITE FREQUENTLY EVALUATION METHODOLOGY IS NOT WELL MATCHED TO THE TYPE OF PROGRAM BEING EVALUATED.
Abstract: THE SAMPLE WAS SELECTED FROM APPROXIMATELY 1,500 ABSTRACTS OF STUDIES PROVIDED BY LEAA'S NCJRS VIA A KEYWORD SEARCH ON 'EVALUATIONS' CONDUCTED IN LATE 1977. THE 200 EVALUATIONS CONSTITUTE A STRUCTURED RATHER THAN A RANDOM SAMPLE, WITH 50 PERCENT OF THE SAMPLE FROM 'LOGISTICAL' PROGRAMS AND 50 PERCENT FROM SOCIAL SERVICE PROGRAMS. ALSO, ELEMENTS OF THREE LEAA EVALUATION EFFORTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE: NATIONAL EVALUATION PROGRAM (NEP) PHASE I STUDIES, 'EXEMPLARY PROJECTS' AND 'EXEMPLARY VALIDATION REPORTS,' AND LEAA IMPACT CITIES PROGRAM. ISSUES OF INTEREST WERE THE STATE OF THE ART IN THESE CRIMINAL JUSTICE EVALUATIONS, THE ATTRIBUTES OF EVALUATIONS (E.G., METHODOLOGY, USE OF RESULTS) IN COMPARISON WITH PROGRAM TYPE AND SPONSORING AGENCY, AND THE FLEXIBILITY OF EVALUATIONS BEING CARRIED OUT SO THAT CHANGE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROGRAM GROWTH AND MODIFICATION IS POSSIBLE. REFLECTING THE IMPORTANCE OF INPUTS, PROCESS, AND OUTCOME, THE STUDY WAS STRUCTURED AROUND THESE ELEMENTS AND TOOK INTO ACCOUNT CONCERNS SUCH AS THE ACCESSIBILITY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE FINAL REPORT, APPROPRIATENESS AND APPLICATION OF METHODOLOGY, DEGREE OF COMPREHENSIVENESS, AND FLEXIBILITY OF DESIGN AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION. ALSO INVESTIGATED WERE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PROGRAM STAFF AND EVALUATORS AND DEMONSTRATED AWARENESS OF INSTITUTIONAL AND PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE PROGRAM AND ITS EVALUATION. OVERALL RESULTS SHOWED THAT QUITE FREQUENTLY THE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY USED WAS NOT WELL MATCHED TO THE TYPE OF PROGRAM BEING EVALUATED, DIFFICULTIES IN APPLYING VARIOUS TYPES OF SOCIAL SCIENCE METHODS AND MEASURES WERE EXPERIENCED TO A LARGE DEGREE, AND THE TIMING OF THE FINAL REPORTS OFTEN WAS POOR. OTHER FINDINGS ARE ENUMERATED. TABULAR DATA, FIGURES, FOOTNOTES, AND APPENDIXES INCLUDING A SELECTED SAMPLE OF 200 EVALUATION DOCUMENTS, THE FINAL PHASE II CHECKLIST, COMPUTER CODE LISTS, AND THE COMPUTER PRINTOUT ARE PROVIDED. (PRG)
Index Term(s): Adult felony system; Analysis; Critiques; Evaluation criteria; Evaluation of evaluation; Evaluation techniques; Evaluative research; LEAA exemplary programs; National Evaluation Program; Program evaluation review techniques; Reference materials
To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=61200
. A title search of
WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click
"Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain
active for 30 minutes. Learn More.
