skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 62653 Find in a Library
Title: CANADIAN TRIAL JUDGES' VIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL A REPORT TO THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF CANADA (FROM STUDIES ON THE JURY - CANADA, 1979 - SEE NCJ-62650)
Author(s): A DOOB
Corporate Author: Law Reform Cmssn of Canada
Canada
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 53
Sponsoring Agency: Law Reform Cmssn of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OL6, Canada
Type: Statistics
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: RESULTS ARE PRESENTED OF A SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE SENT TO 530 JUDGES HAVING JURISDICTION TO HEAR CRIMINAL JURY TRIALS IN CANADA; JUDGES' REACTIONS TO ISSUES REGARDING THE JURY SYSTEM ARE ADDRESSED.
Abstract: A TOTAL OF 179 JUDGES RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES THAT WERE FILLED OUT WITH VARYING DEGREES OF COMPLETENESS. QUESTIONS RELATED TO SUCH TOPICS AS OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE JURY; JURY FUNCTION; JURY SERVICE, ORIENTATION, SELECTION, SIZE, AND PARTICIPATION; MAJORITY VERDICTS; CHARGE TO THE JURY; AND PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS. RESPONSES INDICATED OVERALL APPROVAL OF THE JURY SYSTEM AND CONFIDENCE IN JURORS' VERDICT-FINDING ABILITY. MOST JUDGES BELIEVE THERE IS A NEED FOR STREAMLINING JURY SERVICE. MOST ARE CONTENT WITH SELECTION PROCEDURES EXCEPT FOR 'STAND ASIDE'. MANY FEEL THAT THE NEED FOR JURY TRIALS SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE CORRELATED WITH THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. OVER HALF OF THE RESPONDENTS ALLOW JURORS TO ASK QUESTIONS AND OVER ONE-THIRD ALLOW NOTE TAKING. IN ADDITION, MOST BELIEVE THE PRESENT SIZE OF THE JURY SHOULD BE MAINTAINED AND THAT IMPROVEMENTS COULD BE MADE IN JURY INSTRUCTIONS THROUGH STANDARDIZATION. FOOTNOTES, STATISTICAL TABULAR DATA, AND AN APPENDIX ARE PROVIDED IN THE STUDY. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED--LWM)
Index Term(s): Canada; Criminal proceedings; Judges; Juries; Questionnaires; Statistical analysis; Surveys; Trials
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=62653

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.