skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 63562 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM (FROM INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM HEARINGS BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE NEAR EAST AND SOUTH ASIA, 93RD CONGRESS, 2ND SESSION, JUNE 11, 18, 19 AND 24, 1974 - SEE NCJ-63559)
Author(s): R FALK
Corporate Author: US Congress
House Subcommittee on the Near East and South Asia
United States of America
Date Published: 1974
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: US Congress
Washington, DC 20515
Type: Legislative/Regulatory Material
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A 'LAW AND ORDER' APPROACH TO INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM IS EVALUATED, AND U.S. POLICY IS APPRAISED IN THIS PRESENTATION FROM A CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ON TERRORISM.
Abstract: BECAUSE MOST TERRORISTS, PARTICULARLY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, ADOPT A DESPERATE VIEW OF THEIR SITUATION, RUTHLESS AND LARGE-SCALE RESPONSES TO TERRORIST ACTIVITY WILL PROBABLY BE INEFFECTIVE. REFLECTING THIS LAW AND ORDER APPROACH, ISRAELI TACTICS ARE DESIGNED TO WEAKEN THE LINKS BETWEEN THE PALESTINIAN MASSES AND THE TERRORIST CADRES, TO REASSURE THE ISRAELI POPULATION THAT THE PALESTINIANS WILL SUFFER FROM THEIR ACTS, AND TO ENCOURAGE MODERATE PALESTINIANS TO COUNSEL OTHERS AGAINST TERRORIST ACTIVITIES. THIS POLICY IS UNLIKELY TO SUCCEED UNLESS ISRAEL MANAGES TO BARGAIN WITH ARAB GOVERNMENTS AND THEREBY PREVENT THE USE OF ARAB TERRITORY AS A TERRORIST BASE OF OPERATIONS. AN ALTERNATIVE TO THIS APPROACH IS AN ACCOMMODATION ORIENTATION. BOTH SIDES SHOULD INSIST ON COMPROMISE, PREMISED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PALESTINIANS HAVE GENUINE, SUBSTANTIAL GRIEVANCES DESERVING CONSTRUCTIVE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OF NATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION. U.S. POLICY SHOULD SEEK TO RECONCILE THE GOALS OF PREVENTING TERRORISM WITH THOSE OF SATISFYING THE LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES OF THE TERRORISTS. SOME STEPS FOR THE U.S. INCLUDE EVALUATING THE GRIEVANCES HELD BY TERRORIST GROUPS, PROTECTING CIVILIANS FROM STATE AND TERRORIST ACTION, AND ESTABLISHING AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT TO PROSECUTE TERRORISTS AND COUNTERTERRORISTS. (WJR)
Index Term(s): Counter-terrorism tactics; Crisis management; International terrorism; Israel; Middle East; Policy analysis; Revolutionary or terrorist groups; Terrorism prosecution; United States of America; US House of Representatives
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=63562

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.