skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 64497 Find in a Library
Title: TAKING THE FIFTH - THE SUPREME COURT AND THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION
Author(s): M BERGER
Corporate Author: Lexington Books
United States of America
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 296
Sponsoring Agency: Lexington Books
New York, NY 10022
Sale Source: Lexington Books
866 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
Type: Historical Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: HISTORIC AND CONCEPTUAL ROOTS OF THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, RELEVANT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AND THE NEED FOR A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH IN DEFINING THE PARAMETERS OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT ARE DISCUSSED.
Abstract: CONSISTENTLY, THROUGH MANY CENTURIES, THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT HAS PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS AGAINST ABUSES OF STATE AUTHORITY AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SPHERE OF PRIVACY INTO WHICH THE STATE COULD NOT INTRUDE. TRADITIONALLY, A BROAD VIEW HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEGREE OF INCRIMINATION NECESSARY TO JUSTIFY INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. INCLUDED HAVE BEEN COMPLETE CONFESSIONS OF GUILT AND ADMISSIONS OF THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CRIME. ALSO COVERED ARE RELATIONS CONSTITUTING A 'LINK IN THE CHAIN OF TESTIMONY' LEADING TOWARD A CONVICTION. SIMILARLY, TESTIMONY THAT COULD BE USED TO 'SEARCH OUT OTHER TESTIMONY TO BE USED IN EVIDENCE' IS COVERED BY THE PRIVILEGE. THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE INCRIMINATION STANDARD IS TO MAKE REJECTION OF A CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE DIFFICULT, THEREBY FRUSTRATING THE STATE'S ABILITY TO ACQUIRE INFORMATION. IN RECENT YEARS, HOWEVER, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CORE FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF THE DEFENDANT TO REFUSE TO TAKE THE WITNESS STAND AT HIS/HER OWN TRIAL, PRIVILEGE INTERESTS ARE NARROWLY CONSTRUED AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERCUT EVEN WHERE RECOGNIZED. TO REVERSE THE TREND TOWARD THE CONSTRICTION OF THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, A THOROUGH RE-EVALUATION OF THE ENTIRE BODY OF FIFTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE IS NECESSARY. THIS RE-EVALUATION SHOULD EXAMINE PROTECTION OF THE SANCTITY OF DOCUMENTS, CONSIDER PROCEDURAL REFORM IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, AND EXAMINE A TOTAL REVAMPING OF THE COURT'S APPROACH TO BALANCING THE STATE'S INTERESTS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. NOTES, A BIBLIOGRAPHY, A TABLE OF CASES, AND AN INDEX ARE PROVIDED. (RCB)
Index Term(s): Critiques; Judicial decisions; Right against self incrimination; US Supreme Court
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=64497

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.