skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 68108 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: MEDICAID ANTI-FRAUD PROGRAMS - THE ROLE OF STATE FRAUD CONTROL UNITS - HEARING BEFORE S SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING, JULY 25, 1978
Author(s): ANON
Corporate Author: US Congress
Senate Special Cmtte on Aging
United States of America
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 55
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
US Congress
Washington, DC 20575
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislative/Regulatory Material
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: TESTIMONY FROM FOUR WITNESSES FOCUSED ON IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS OF FEDERAL LAWS WHICH PROVIDE FUNDING FOR STATES TO ESTABLISH SPECIAL UNITS TO INVESTIGATE MEDICAID FRAUD.
Abstract: MEDICARE/MEDICAID ANTI-FRAUD AND ANTI-ABUSE AMENDMENTS ENACTED IN 1977 AUTHORIZED 90 PERCENT FUNDING FOR STATE INVESTIGATIVE UNITS FOR A 3-YEAR PERIOD, BUT BY MID-1978 ONLY NINE STATES WERE PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAM. THE HEARINGS EXAMINED THIS SLOW RATE OF PROGRESS, THE FUTURE OF SUCH UNITS WHEN FEDERAL FUNDING EXPIRES IN OCTOBER 1980, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AMENDMENT'S PROVISIONS CONCERNING OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT DISCLOSURE FOR MEDICAID PROVIDERS. AN OFFICIAL FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE'S (DHEW) HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION STATED THAT 35 STATE UNITS SHOULD BE CERTIFIED BY THE END OF 1978. HE ALSO DISCUSSED REASONS WHY SOME STATES WILL NOT ESTABLISH INVESTIGATIVE UNITS, THE IMPORTANCE OF PAYMENT DATA SYSTEMS IN IDENTIFYING FRAUD, AND PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT THE DISCLOSURE REGULATIONS. A DEPUTY INSPECTOR FROM HEW'S OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DESCRIBED ITS ROLE IN ASSISTING STATE FRAUD UNITS AND SUPPORTED THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE PROGRAMS. TOPICS COVERED IN THE SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSION AMONG THESE WITNESSES AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS INCLUDED FEDERAL EFFORTS TO COMBAT MEDICAID FRAUD, JURISDICTION PROBLEMS BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS, THE OFFICE OF PROGRAM INTEGRITY, AND COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE ANTI-FRAUD PROGRAM. NEW YORK'S PROBLEMS WITH MEDICAID FRAUD WERE DETAILED BY A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO ALSO CRITICIZED THE SLOW PACE OF CERTIFICATION. AN OFFICIAL INVOLVED WITH CONNECTICUT'S MEDICAID FRAUD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM RECOMMENDED THAT, ALTHOUGH MOST COLLECTIBLE CASES WERE IN THE AREA OF ABUSE, THE STATE FRAUD UNITS SHOULD BE CONTINUED FOR THEIR DETERRENT VALUE. PROBLEMS IN BALANCING SERVICE DELIVERY WITH FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS AND CONNECTICUT'S INFORMATION SYSTEM WERE EXAMINED. THE APPENDIXES CONTAIN CORRESPONDENCE RELATING TO THE HEARING FROM HEW OFFICIALS, WISCONSIN'S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AND THE DIRECTOR OF CONNECTICUT'S MEDICAL CARE ADMINISTRATION. (MJM)
Index Term(s): Connecticut; Federal regulations; Fraud; Investigative powers; Medicaid/Medicare fraud; New York; State government
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=68108

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.