skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 69149 Find in a Library
Title: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT ON SEX-BASED DIFFERENCES IN THE HANDLING OF ADULT CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS
Journal: CRIME AND DELINQUENCY  Volume:26  Issue:3  Dated:(JULY 1980)  Pages:344-357
Author(s): D J STEFFENSMEIER
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 14
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: THIS REPORT EVALUATES THE ARGUMENT THAT, WITH CHANGES IN SEX ROLES AND THE CONTEMPORARY WOMEN'S MOVEMENT, SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS ARE DIMINISHING.
Abstract: AFTER A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, FIVE FACTORS ARE SUGGESTED AS HELPING TO ACCOUNT FOR THE APPARENTLY CONSISTENT FINDING OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT (THOUGH OF SMALL MAGNITUDE) OF FEMALE DEFENDANTS ACROSS MOST OFFENSE CATEGORIES. THESE FACTORS ARE CHIVALRY, NAIVETE, PRACTICALITY, DEFENDANTS' PERCEIVED FUTURE CRIMINALITY, AND THE PERCEIVED DANGER ASSOCIATED WITH DEFENDANTS. THE DIMINUTION OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN SENTENCING OUTCOMES MUST BE A RESULT OF CHANGES IN SENTENCING PRACTICES. IN EXAMINING THE SELECTED FACTORS IN THE CONTEXT OF SENTENCING PRACTICES, IT IS ARGUED THAT (1) THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT SHOW CHIVALRY TO BE AN IMPORTANT DETERMINANT OF SENTENCING DECISIONS; RATHER, THE FACTORS OF PERCEIVED DANGER AND FUTURE CRIMINALITY APPEAR MORE SIGNIFICANT; (2) EVEN IF CHIVALRY WERE A SIGNIFICANT DETERMINANT, THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THAT COURT OFFICIALS REMAIN AS CHIVALROUS AS EVER; AND (3) SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, INCREASING PROFESSIONALISM OF COURT OFFICIALS, AND THE GROWING COURT BUREAUCRACY MAY HAVE REDUCED SENTENCING DISPARITIES BY SEX, AS THEY APPEAR TO HAVE DONE WITH RESPECT TO RACE AND SOCIAL CLASS. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT CHANGING SEX ROLE DEFINITIONS AND THE CONTEMPORARY WOMEN'S MOVEMENT HAVE HAD LITTLE IMPACT ON SENTENCING OUTCOMES OF EITHER MALE OR FEMALE DEFENDANTS. OVER 40 FOOTNOTES ARE APPENDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)
Index Term(s): Female sex roles; Sentencing disparity; Sex discrimination; Socioculture
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=69149

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.