skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 69552 Find in a Library
Title: Fines and Justice Administration - The Experience of the Federal Republic of Germany
Journal: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice  Volume:4  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1980)  Pages:3-14
Author(s): H J Albrecht; E H Johnson
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 12
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Several classes of data were collected in the courts of Baden-Wuerttemberg of the Federal Republic of Germany, with information on 1,863 cases resulting in conviction in 1972, to discover the impact of the revised use of fines.
Abstract: As part of its effort to revise the penal code in 1969, the Federal Republic of Germany increased its reliance on fines, including the introduction of day fines, in lieu of short-term imprisonment for minor offenses. The setting of fines according to the defendant's income is basic to the day-fine system, where the gradation of penalties, according to the evaluation of the seriousness of the offense, is measured by the number of days that the proportionate fine must be paid. Germany's previous trend toward the use of fines was accelerated by the requirement that courts order imprisonment only in exceptional cases. Traffic cases were particularly affected. The qualities of the offense and the absence of previous offenses, rather than an individual study of the offender, continued to be the dominant criterion influencing the choice of a fine. The chief effect of day fines was higher amounts applied to the more affluent defendants. Yet the amount of the fine appeared to have no effect on subsequent recidivism. For first offenders, fines were superior to imprisonment in avoiding reconviction. Day fines were no more effective (but not less effective) than imprisonment in the instance of traffic offenses. Fines were superior to other sanctions for petty property offenders but not for career thieves. Thus, 10 years after the introduction of the fine on a large scale basis, data support the view that the policy has been found politically acceptable, administratively practical, and penologically sound. Twenty-five references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Fines; Germany; Misdemeanor
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=69552

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.