skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 69595 Find in a Library
Title: Classification and Prediction of Violence for Criminal Offenders - State of the Art and Policy Options
Author(s): R E Feldman
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 220
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Corrections
Washington, DC 20534
Contract Number: J100C-23689
Type: Best Practice/State-of-the-Art Review
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of screening individuals for 'dangerousness' in the U.S. criminal justice system.
Abstract: Although offenders are classified as 'violent' or 'nonviolent' throughout the criminal justice system, reliability of the violence classification systems is unknown. The assets and liabilities of present classification procedures and predictive models are discussed, and equity and legality of treating individuals differently on the basis of classification variables are examined. The review is intended to present a context for an analysis of options for the National Institute of Corrections' activities in this area. Individual chapters focus on the reasons for classifying, the definitions of dangerousness, the identities of those who screen for violence in the criminal justice system, the social and biosocial science literature on screening for violence, policy and legal issues, and the Federal role in classification and prediction. The paper concludes that (1) the 'potentially violent' cannot be identified with sufficient reliability to effect a practical instrument for violence prediction, (2) ethnicity or surrogates for race in predictive schemes are unconstitutional, (3) a majority of those alleged to be dangerous are not so, and (4) predictive schemes will continue to be used if only for symbolic reasons. Current classification sheets and 200 references are included, and appendixes contain related journal articles and information on the Alabama Prison Classification Project.
Index Term(s): Corrections management; Dangerousness; Equal Protection; Inmate classification; Laws and Statutes; National Institute of Corrections (NIC); Policy analysis; Prediction; Prisoner's rights; Psychological evaluation
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.