skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 69894 Find in a Library
Title: California's County Justice System Subvention Program
Journal: California Youth Authority Quarterly  Volume:32  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer/Fall 1980)  Pages:43-53
Author(s): J Phelan
Corporate Author: California Dept of the Youth Authority
United States of America
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: California Dept of the Youth Authority
Sacramento, CA 95823
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: California's County Justice System Subvention Program (CJSSP) was established in July 1978 to encourage local sentencing alternatives and to improve local justice system offender-centered services.
Abstract: Intended for the reimbursement of State-mandated county costs for status offenders, the CJSSP replaced previous State subsidies for probation supervision and the construction and maintenance of juvenile homes, ranches, and camps. The program aims to reduce the number of offenders reentering the local criminal justice system, protect and care for children and youth, and assist counties in providing appropriate local services and facilities for youth and adults. The program establishes new county funding sources, assumes costs of Chapter 1071 of the Statutes of 1976, appropriates a total of $63.3 million, and allows county selection of funding formulas. Moreover, CJSSP requires counties to maintain their commitment limits, and requires repayment or withholds funds if counties exceed their commitment limit, establishes a 16-person county justice system advisory group. Controversy arose over the need for carryover of funds from one year to the next. In addition, there were problems with the lack of required local program evaluations, the need to expand the list of serious offenses not charged against the county's commitment limit, and the impact of plea bargaining. The program's first year of implementation showed that the greatest shift in funds was received by private agencies (whose funds increased), that most counties exceeded their commitment limits without having to repay, and that the cost for 1979-80 was $219,313. Areas that must be resolved included the funding level uncertainty, commitment limits, and the need for comprehensive and timely information. Overall, the program appears to be meeting a definite need in California. Tables show the first-year costs of the program.
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; California; Community-based corrections (juvenile); Local government; Status offender diversion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=69894

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.