skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 69997 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Georgia Prisons
Author(s): Anonymous
Corporate Author: Georgia Advisory Cmtte
United States of America
Date Published: 1976
Page Count: 77
Sponsoring Agency: Georgia Advisory Cmtte
Atlanta, GA 30303
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Georgia Advisory Committee report on conditions in Georgia's adult penal institutions examines racial patterns in prison work assignments, education and vocational opportunities, and overall treatment of inmates.
Abstract: This report on Georgia prisons is based on information presented at an informal hearing and on field work done by The Georgia Advisory Committee and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. The Advisory Committee found that although the more recent State administrations have been progressive, the prison system suffers from inadequate funds to maintain facilities and services for its prisoners. Many of the prisons are antiquated, overcrowded, and understaffed. Minorities are not hired proportionately to their numbers in the State population because the prisons are located in rural, predominantely white areas. As of July 1975, there were only 213 blacks on the staff, while there were 6,080 black inmates in a total prison population of 10,109. White staff numbered 1,847. The committee found that one cause of recidivism (60-70 percent) was that most of the work done by Georgia inmates has little, or, at best, very low marketability outside prison: argricultural labor, prison, and highway maintenance. According to the State Corrections commissioner, a substantial portion of the prison population cannot be assigned to more sophisticated tasks becasue of the lack of properly trained personnel. In fact, the limited number of guards restricts the number of inmates given anything to do outside their cells. The committee found that the medical services are inadequate; only three institutions have full-time doctors or dentists. No full-time psychiatrist is employed. There are no consistent rules regarding specific penalties for specific rule infractions; disciplinary practices are left to the discretion of wardens. Moreover, the legal services provided are inadequate. The State assumes no responsibility for the provision of legal counsel after the inmates have been sentenced by the courts. In addition, neither academic training nor recreation programs are priorities at most institutions. The Advisory Committee made the following recommendations to the State legislature and to the board of corrections: active recruitment of black staff, provision of opportunities for inmates to learn marketable skills or trades, expansion of work release and recreation programs, and provision of academic training. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Correctional institutions (adult); Correctional personnel; Correctional planning; Correctional reform; Female inmates; Georgia (USA); Inmate academic education; Inmate Programs; Inmate vocational training; State correctional facilities; Women's correctional institutions
Note: Report prepared by the Georgia Advisory Committee to the U S Commission on Civil Rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.