skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70101 Find in a Library
Title: Nature and Reliability of Audit Evidence
Journal: Journal of Accountancy  Volume:105  Issue:5  Dated:(May 1958)  Pages:40-47
Author(s): R K Mautz
Date Published: 1958
Page Count: 8
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The article examines legal and accounting aspects of audit evidence with regard to reliability, adequacy of sample, and validity of documents.
Abstract: Unlike lawyers, an auditor in an investigation is not guided by any rules of evidence and works alone without the competition of an opposing point of view. Any factual material available to an auditor which is pertinent to an evaluation of financial statements constitutes audit evidence and can be categorized as real, testimonial, or indirect evidence. Real evidence includes things actually examined by the auditor, while testimonial evidence is obtained through oral or written statements from other people. Indirect evidence encompasses documents, records, and events that the auditor uses in forming an opinion on financial statements. The reliability of audit evidence varies considerably among the major classes of evidence and within each class. Unwarranted inferences from audit evidence present a major danger, and the auditor should ascertain that any conclusions are based on specific evidential materials. The auditor must also be wary of misinterpretation, particularly with respect to evidence obtained from other people. Since relatively little audit evidence is fully conclusive, the auditor must be constantly concerned with the quality and quantity of the evidence and acquire more data if the available material is inadequate. In assessing the reliability of real evidence, the timing must be examined. Testimonial evidence poses additional problems of reliability based on the character and qualifications of the testifier. The auditor should consider the possibility of manipulation or falsification in indirect evidence, the atmosphere in which he is working, evaluate all available evidence, and from it infer the truthfulness of a financial statement.
Index Term(s): Auditing standards; Audits; Evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.