skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70130 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Mississippi Court Finance Study - Volume 3 - The Mississippi Jury System - Management and Cost Analysis
Corporate Author: Ernest H Short and Associates
United States of America
Project Director: E H Short
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 119
Sponsoring Agency: Ernest H Short and Associates
Sacramento, CA 95821
Mississippi Judicial Council
Jackson, MS 39201
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
US Dept of Justice
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 78-DF-AX-0215
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This third volume of a six-volume study of the Mississippi court system documents how the existing jury management system operates with reference to statutory guidelines determining administrative practice.
Abstract: Measures of jury activity volume and jury system costs were taken during data collection for this phase of the study; statistics are presented in aggregate and individual form. The report identifies seven major issues in jury management and organizes analytical discussion and presentation of recommendations around these issues. The issues are community representativeness of the source lists used; randomness in the selection of prospective jurors; efficiency of the summoning process; size of weekly empanelments; and comparison of system costs and activity volume (number summoned, number empaneled) to corresponding jury trials and juror days. Related issues include the length of jury service and rates of juror compensation. The analysis is based on an examination of administrative practices in 12 of the State's 82 counties. Selection of jurors is properly random in the State, but the selection process can be streamlined by elimination of the 'jury box.' Juror length of service and compensation rates are appropriate and pose no obstacles to adminsitrative efficiency. The use of a single source list is not the best way to obtain community representativeness, but the benefits of integrating multiple lists must be weighed against the cost of doing so. Telephone alert systems can save juror fee costs and are working well in many Mississippi trial courts. Summoning process efficiency is mitigated by outdated voter registration lists; these lists should be constantly updated to avoid issuing an excess number of summons. The area offering the greatest opportunity for cost savings is that of the size of weekly empanelments. Management information is not being kept on jury activities; statistical recordkeeping on jury trials and juror use would facilitate cost savings in juror fees. Forms used in the current jury management system and other materials are appended. Tabular data, figures, and footnotes are provided. For related volumes, see NCJ 70127-29 and 70131-34.
Index Term(s): Court management; Juries; Juror utilization; Jury selection; Mississippi
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.