skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70136 Find in a Library
Title: Community Anti-Crime Program - A Preliminary Assessment of the Concept
Author(s): W V Rouse; P G Hartjens; K Kerns; J Greenspan; F Gragg
Corporate Author: American Institutes for Research
Ctr for Effective Collaboration and Practice
United States of America
Project Director: P G Hartjens
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 38
Sponsoring Agency: American Institutes for Research
Washington, DC 20007
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Publication Number: AIR 80101-1/80-IR
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The evaluation assesses three components of the Community Anti-Crime Program: grantee characteristics, citizen participation in program development and implementation, and implementation activities.
Abstract: Established by an amendment to the Crime Control Act of 1976, the Community Anti-Crime Program (CACP) was mandated to provide technical assistance and other services to community groups emphasizing citizen participation in law enforcement activities. Data for the evaluation report are drawn from grantees' applications, from a mail survey sent to all 141 grantees, and from site visits to 36 projects. An examination of the distribution of grantees reveals that CAC cities in general have worse property and violent crime rates than in the Nation as a whole, and that most projects have either a history of community organizing or an active crime prevention unit in the police department, but less than one-fourth have both. Also, many CAC projects are located in communities facing multiple socioeconomic and crime problems. Considerable variation in the roles of citizens and community boards is noted in both the visited sites and in the survey data. For most projects, citizens were involved in program planning, the community board took an active role in program development and management, and citizens were recruited to aid implementation of project activities. Assessment of activities shows the majority focused on opportunity reduction strategies. Although most project activities are functioning, no measure is yet available on their impact. A total of 18 tables are included.
Index Term(s): Community crime prevention programs; Community involvement; Crime Control Programs; Evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.