skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70175 Find in a Library
Title: New Idealism and Penal Living Standards
Journal: Crime and Social Justice  Issue:13  Dated:(Summer 1980)  Pages:45-51
Author(s): H Schwendinger; J Schwendinger
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 7
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Only through pressure from prisoner unions and political organizations within and outside prisons will legal reforms be accomplished that change the brutal standards of prison life.
Abstract: From the currently popular conservative viewpoint, prisons are seen as instruments of punishment. This view assumes the fundamental fairness of punishment and its utility for crime deterrence. The principle of fairness calls for graded punishments whose severity conforms with the crimes committed. The principal fault with this viewpoint lies in aquiescence to the brutal prison conditions that are mainly due to the lack of funds and that make prisons the breeding ground for recidivism. This viewpoint is modified in the 'justice model' which advocates fairness in prison management through prisoner self-government, legal aid, and 'flat time' rather than indeterminate sentences. However, no changes in structural or administrative relations are recommended; therefore it is doubtful that this model would work. The contrasting viewpoint, opposed to the idea of punishment, calls for prisons to become the place of rehabilitation, where the root causes of crime would be eradicated. However this notion is severely limited, because it explicitly justifies better living standards only when they contribute to lower recidivism. Supportive relations between rehabilitation and human rights are therefore ambiguous and by no means assured. Since either of the presented viewpoints can lead to more humane prisons, it is recommended that the ideological struggles for prison reform adopt the vocabulary of the citizens' rights and human rights movements. Present rehabilitation programs might become more effective if pressure from prisoners' unions and working class organizations insisted that the slotting of ex-offenders into unstable, low paying jobs be stopped. References are included.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; Custody vs treatment conflict; Inmate political affiliation; Inmate unions; Political influences; Prisoner's rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70175

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.