skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70229 Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing of Convicted Offenders - An Analysis of the Public's View
Journal: Law and Society Review  Volume:14  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1980)  Pages:223-261
Author(s): A Blumstein; J Cohen
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 39
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This survey of public attitudes about appropriate prison sentences for convicted offenders arises from the need to know the public's view of the 'just deserts' model which is displacing the rehabilitation model.
Abstract: In the spring of 1977, the survey was administered to a random sample of 2,500 households in Pennsylvania with questions regarding demographic information, extent of victimization among respondents, and respondents' attitudes on appropriate prison terms for convicted offenders. The two main issues addressed were the degree of consensus within the population about appropriate sentences for different offenses and the relationship between the desired sentences expressed by the public and the actual time served by offenders in prison. Analysis suggests considerable agreement across various demographic groups on the relative severity of sentences to be imposed for different offenses, but it also shows disagreement over the absolute magnitude of these sentences. These results indicate both the feasibility of generating consensus on a proportional, just desert sentencing schedule and the difficulty in establishing the 'constant of proportionality.' The sentences desired by the public are found to be consistently more severe than sentences actually imposed, implying the need for greater public awareness of current imprisonment practices so that expectations of the determinate sentencing schedules will be realistic and consistent with limited prison capacity. Attention would have to be paid to such problems as prison overcrowding, budgetary constraints, and the deleterious effects of imprisonment on inmates and society in general. Extensive supporting tables and 33 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Crime seriousness measures; Just deserts theory; Penalty severity rating; Pennsylvania; Public Attitudes/Opinion; Sentencing/Sanctions; Surveys
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70229

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.