skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70233 Find in a Library
Title: Thinking About Courts - Toward and Beyond a Jurisprudence of Judicial Competence
Journal: Law and Society Review  Volume:14  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1980)  Pages:371-420
Author(s): R Cavanagh; A Sarat
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 50
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Arguments about limitations on judicial competence or capacity are discarded in favor of arguments for reforms that focus beyond the courts toward a wide range of social goals, such as strengthening family and community institutions.
Abstract: Changes in courts, designed within the framework of traditional judicial procedures and intended to increase the ability of courts to manage particular kinds of litigation, may have dysfunctional side effects that are inadequately understood. Yet, when problems of competence or capacity are treated as simply, or even primarily, court problems, reform strategies may alleviate those problems only to generate broader social and political dislocations. The concern for judicial competence and capacity is both overstated and misstated, as a look at three types of litigation shows: the courts' handling of unrepresented defendants (i.e., debtor-tenant defaults), related-party disputes, and extended impact cases; all cases which have emerged from private sector handling to be handled by the courts. The concern is overstated because it has tended to ignore the ability of the courts to adapt to changes in the kinds of litigation with which they must deal; it is misstated because it tends to isolate court problems from the more fundamental social and political problems of which they are at best symptoms. The difficulties faced by courts are the result of changes in both private and public institutions and in social practices. As authority in families, churches, and schools has eroded through urbanization and industrialization and as new burdens have been placed on government bodies other than courts, the courts have been asked to cope with problems that have sapped the strength of alternative institutions. Until America can come to terms with the causes of those fundamental changes in society and politics, the problems of the courts will not be fully alleviated. Courts will continue to have to respond to regulating activities or have to resolve the disputes of people joined through relationships of trust, affiliation, or functional interdependence. Case law is cited and about 125 references and numerous footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Court reform; Cultural influences; Economic influences; Political influences; Social cohesion; Social conditions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70233

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.