skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70246 Find in a Library
Title: Determination of Criminal Insanity in Western Nigeria (Africa)
Journal: Journal of Modern African Studies  Volume:14  Issue:2  Dated:(1976)  Pages:219-245
Author(s): L Bienen
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 27
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: The statutory standard for the determination of criminal responsibility in Western Nigeria, being a variant of the 'M'Naghten rule' of British jurisprudence, should be revised as a determinant of criminal insanity.
Abstract: Given that the rules are completely foreign in an area of law where cultural differences are extremely important, the M'Naghten standard functions far better than might be expected. However, in a study of homicide cases from 1966 to 1972, it was found that for those who showed signs of mental disturbance, the presence of expert testimony at their trials seemed to be strongly related to the judicial outcome. The decision not to call for a court examination seemed to be highly prejudicial to the accused in that he had almost no chance of being acquitted as insane without the help of expert testimony. Yet given the small number of homicide cases which actually come to trial, this should not be an excessive burden to Western Nigeria's psychiatric profession. The Criminal Procedure Code could easily be amended to require mental examination. Those homicides in which witchcraft was involved were likely to result in convictions, although the Western Nigerian judges were not unwilling to acquit for insanity. While distinctive patterns of homicide occurred among those accused identified as mentally ill, they were processed through the courts more slowly and were more likely to be found guilty. Recommendations for change would include the issuance of more detailed reports on the behavior and appearance of the accused in custody, as well as the institution of a background investigation immediately after the crime, which would preserve useful facts for the defense. As long as traditional healers treat more disturbed patients than will ever see a mental hospital, then the current, routine exclusion of such testimony seems unnecessarily prejudicial to the accused. Such fine points as the formulation of standards for irresistible impulse and diminished responsibility must be set out in the courts' opinions so that Western Nigerian case law can develop. Finally, all references to juries should be removed from the official legislation, as juries are never used. Appendixes present case studies and descriptions of the research instruments. Footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Competency to stand trial; Criminal intent; Criminal responsibility; Cultural influences; Expert witnesses; Forensic psychiatry; Insanity defense; Laws and Statutes; Mentally ill offenders; Nigeria; Trial procedures
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.