skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70250 Find in a Library
Title: Deterrent Effect of Urban Police Services - Further Results
Journal: Annals of Regional Science  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:(1979)  Pages:66-77
Author(s): S L Mehay
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 12
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study formulates a disaggregated model of crime-deterrent resource utilization at the local police level and tests the implications of the model with data from a sample of municipal departments located in a single metropolitan area.
Abstract: The model of the crime deterrence process is based on an assumption that the police objective in allocating resources among various programs is to minimize the social losses from crime. The independent deterrent effects of two such programs, involving patrol and investigation units, are analyzed with linear regression analysis and data from police departments in the Los Angeles region. The two subprograms, identified as visible patrol and investigation, are assumed to affect offender risk perceptions via two different channels--patrol through a threat of immediate arrest for all offenses, investigation through a long-run threat of arrest for more serious offenses. Enforcement levels in patrol and investigation are measured by the density of visible patrol units and the citywide arrest rate. A third indicator, the ratio of filings to arrest, is introduced to measure the joint production of both subprograms. The evidence tends to support the view of the deterrence process--that offenders form subjective risk estimates based on the visible presence of the police, and that increasing patrol visibility can therefore have a significant deterrent effect. The study refutes both the extreme positions frequently taken in the public debate over crime control policy--that crime is beyond the control of the police, that increasing police expenditures will be ineffective, and that only wholesale expansion of police manpower will solve the urban crime problem. The most cost-effective police policy appears to be one that requires the least additional new resources or new spending but merely redeploys existing police resources. Such changes by local police, combined with attacks by the Federal Government on poverty and racial discrimination in labor and housing markets, appear to offer the greatest hope for reducing urban crime. Tables, an appendix showing data sources, and 24 references are provided.
Index Term(s): California; Criminal investigation units; Deterrence; Models; Municipal police; Patrol; Patrol units; Police resource allocation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.