skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70348 Find in a Library
Title: Prisoner's Access
Journal: Law Quarterly Review  Volume:95  Dated:(July 1979)  Pages:393-417
Author(s): A Beaven
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 25
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: The theory of state justification is examined in three different contexts: the European Convention on Human Rights, the German Prison Act, and English prison law.
Abstract: Cases regarding prisoner's rights have had an important effect on the jurisprudence of the European Convention. By 1968, 56 percent of the applications came from prisoners; in 1977 the proportion was still as high as 36 percent. A review of the cases shows a shift from inherent limitations on a prisoner's rights to state justification of restrictions on the basis of the exceptions named in the Convention (the margin of appreciation). The landmark decision in the Golder case (1976) rejected inherent limitations in favor of the margin of appreciation. In Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court stated that the fundamental rights of a prisoner are limited by the purpose served by the penalty of imprisonment. Also, Germany's Prison Act of 1976 rejected the doctrine in inherent limitations in the context of prisoners' rights. In England, the axiom of prison law is that all behavior that is not expressly allowed is prohibited. Restrictions on prisoner's access are considered in seven areas: arrest, remand, letters, visits, counsel, Members of Parliament, and the European Commission on Human Rights. The paper concludes that rules about prisoners' correspondence should be relaxed before reform is forced by prisoners appealing to the European Commission on Human Rights. Footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Censorship; England; European Commission for Human Rights; Germany; Inmate visits; Laws and Statutes; Prisoner's rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70348

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.