skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70571 Find in a Library
Title: Comments Upon the New Jersey Penal Code
Journal: Criminal Justice Quarterly  Volume:7  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer 1980)  Pages:89-100
Author(s): R E Knowlton
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 12
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Aspects of the New Jersey Penal Code enacted in 1978 are described and critiqued.
Abstract: Following a discussion of the goals of a revision of a criminal code, the general provisions of the New Jersey Code are considered. Specific problems in the provisions are discussed under the subjects of the requirement of reasonableness, the test of responsibility, liability for the acts of others, and entrapment. The categories of offenses in the Code discussed are homicide, sex offenses, and burglary. The Code simplifies the definition of murder through the removal of the issue of capital punishment, making it unnecessary to distinguish between degrees. A straightforward statement of culpability was made possible by the Code's precise definition of the kinds of culpability factors. In revising sex offenses, the Code excludes from criminal conduct sex acts between adults in private. The Code makes clear that shoplifting is not burglary in order to obviate a New Jersey Supreme Court decision that equates the two offenses (Davis v. Hellwig). Sentencing provisions in the Code are discussed under judicial discretion, parole, and sentencing alternatives. Areas of decriminalization are also treated. These include not only adult consensual sex acts, but also public drunkenness and loitering. Overall, the Code is considered to be an improvement over the previous criminal code. Footnotes with references are provided.
Index Term(s): Burglary; Criminal codes; Criminal intent; Decriminalization; Homicide; Judicial discretion; Law reform; New Jersey; Parole; Sentencing/Sanctions; Sex offenses
Note: Reprinted by permission of Rutgers Law Review
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70571

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.