Skip to main content skip navigation
  • Account
    • Login
    • Manage
  • Subscribe
    • JUSTINFO
    • Register
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact Us
    • Email
    • Feedback
    • Chat
    • Phone or Mail
  • Site Help
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Office of Justice Programs header with links to bureaus/offices: BJA, BJS, NIJ, OJJDP, OVC, SMART Office of Justice Programs BJA BJS NIJ OJJDP OVC SMART Office of Justice Programs
Advanced Search  Search Help
    Browse By Topics  down arrow
  • A–Z Topics
  • Corrections
  • Courts
  • Crime
  • Crime Prevention
  • Drugs
  • Justice System
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Law Enforcement
  • Victims
CrimeSolutions
Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar
  • ABOUT NCJRS
  • OJP PUBLICATIONS
  • LIBRARY
  • SEARCH Q & A
  • GRANTS & FUNDING
  • JUSTICE EVENTS
Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

 

NCJ Number: 70684 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Use of Criminal Contempt to Control Prejudicial Publicity - A Comparative Study of Fair Trial and Free Press in England and the United States
Author(s): J R Brantley
Date Published: 1980
Annotation: Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study explores patterns of interaction between the fundamental rights of fair trial and free press in England and the United States; specific attention is given to the use of the criminal contempt power by the courts.
Abstract: Following an historical overview of press-government relations, a summary of the current case law regarding fair trial and free press is presented. To provide background for understanding the differential application of the contempt power, the study introduces the concept of political culture and elements of the sociology of law. Study methodology is comparative legal research through document analysis. The researcher found that both England and the United States have sought to guarantee to their citizens certain fundamental rights vis-a-vis the State. Among these are the right of a person accused of a crime to the fair and impartial administration of justice and the freedom of the pres to publish news of interests to the public. While these two principles may be complementary, publicity about pending judicial proceedings carries the potential for prejudicing justice. When the potential for prejudice crosses a certain threshhold, the courts must intervene to assure a fair trial. A means of intervention common to both countries is the criminal contempt power of the courts. However, the countries' use of the contempt power differs markedly. In England contempt is the primary weapon in the arsenal of justice for guaranteeing that judicial proceedings remain fair and orderly. It may be invoked whenever there is a real risk of prejudice to the defendant or of disturbing the dignity of the court. Conversely, in the United States the primary judicial response to prejudicial publicity is the granting of a new trial to the accused. A concluding section analyzes judicial rationales to determine the social, cultural, or legal values that may have influenced current practices regarding the use of contempt in fair trial-free press situations.
Index Term(s): Canada; Comparative analysis; England; Fair trial-free press; Judicial decisions; Judicial discretion; Pretrial publicity
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Page Count: 149
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Note: University of Maryland - masters thesis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70684

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.




Find in a Library

You have clicked Find in a Library. A title search of WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click "Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain active for 30 minutes. Learn More.

You have selected:

This article appears in

In WorldCat, verify that the library you select has the specific journal volume and issue in which the article appears. Learn How.

Continue to WorldCat

You are about to access WorldCat, NCJRS takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the WorldCat site.

 
Office of Justice Programs Facebook Page  Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Assistance Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics Twitter Page
  • National Institute of Justice Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office for Victims of Crime Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking Facebook Page Twitter Page
Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers
USA.gov | CrimeSolutions
Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs