skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70774 Find in a Library
Title: Technical Methods of Police Investigation and Individual Liberty
Journal: Police Nationale  Issue:113  Pages:2-9
Author(s): J Montreuil
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 8
Format: Article
Language: French
Country: France
Annotation: Specific technical means used in police investigations and legal limitations placed on their use because of potential infringement on individual rights are discussed.
Abstract: While there is a need for sophisticated police technology to investigate burgeoning criminal activities, expecially those of organized crime, certain actions may tend to infringe on individual freedoms. Thus photographs and films are incriminating evidence, but pictures may also misrepresent a situation or be forgeries without any validity. For this reason, Swiss law prohibits taking pictures in private circumstances or using any photograph taken in public without authorization. Likewise, films must be taken in a specific context, (e.g., a bank robbery), for them to be admissible as evidence. Photographs and films may be employed to establish suspects' identity. Similar problems arise in the use of hidden microphones, tape recorders, and telephone eavesdropping techniques. All forms of voice recording pose the danger of violating the private sphere, of trespassing on private property, and of recording private statements without an individual's knowledge. Recording of public remarks is permissible. Recordings and telephone eavesdropping are only authorized for very serious crimes in progress (e.g., hostage situations). Use of various types of detectors (e.g., for metal and speed) and colored powder to apprehend thieves are regarded as acceptable. However, drugs and lie detectors are thought to infringe on the physical and psychological integrity of individuals; only taking blood samples for such purposes as determining blood alcohol levels is allowed. To protect personal information on computers, access to computerized police records has been limited, and linking police records with other computerized information systems is prohibited. Police-press relations remain a controversial area in police investigations. The need to consider the public freedoms and private interests threatened by proposed actions, to examine the legal basis for intervention, and to remember the limitations and inaccuracy potential of modern technical methods of investigation is emphasized. Notes are supplied.
Index Term(s): Criminal investigation; Electronic surveillance; Evidence; Exclusionary rule; Films; Photography; Polygraphs; Science and Technology; Switzerland
Note: Rapport presente le 7 novembre 1979 a l'Institut Suisse de Police (Paper presented November 7, 1979 at the Swiss Police Institute)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.