skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 70790 Find in a Library
Title: Subsequent Dangerousness Among Compulsory Hospital Patients
Journal: British Journal of Criminology  Volume:20  Issue:3  Dated:(July 1980)  Pages:289-295
Author(s): K L Soothill; C K Way; T C N Gibbens
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: Great Britain Mental Health Research Fund
England
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Results are reported from a British study that examined reconvictions for serious offenses of offenders dischared from mental hospitals after having been admitted under a compulsory hospital order.
Abstract: The study took a cohort of hospital orders from another investigation (Gibbens, Soothill, and Pope, 1977) which collected the basic details of men and women medically remanded in magistrates' courts (for 1969) and in higher courts (for 1969 and 1970) in Inner London and in the Wessex Regional Hospital Board area. In addition, a more detailed study was made of all offenders remanded for a medical report in Wessex between September 1, 1970, and April 30, 1971. There were 247 males and 45 females in these samples who received hospital orders. The current study deals only with the 200 males whose files were traced by the Criminal Records Office. The period of followup was 3 years from the committal date; additional data were obtained for 5 years for all cases and for up to 9 years for a smaller number. The only offenses considered were those which 'caused real harm to people.' In the 3-year followup after admission, a 'serious failure' rate of 5 percent was found, compared with 2 percent in a prior similar study (Walker and McCabe, 1973). The difference is understandable in view of the fact that the sample in this study was discharged from the hospital more quickly than the other study's sample, and there was a higher proportion of 'bad risks.' The cumulative total of 'serious failures' at the end of 5 years was 10 percent, and by the end of the seventh year, 'serious failures' had risen to 15 percent. The importance of longitudinal studies in this area of research is indicated, in order to measure the potential harm to citizens occasioned by the current system of treatment and release of those under compulsory hospital orders. Tabular data, footnotes, and 15 references are provided.
Index Term(s): England; Mental health services; Mentally ill offenders; Recidivism; Sentencing/Sanctions; Studies
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=70790

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.