skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70833 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Performance Measurement - Some Conceptual Issues
Journal: Evaluation and Program Planning  Volume:3  Issue:1  Dated:(1980)  Pages:35-43
Author(s): T Connolly; S J Deutsch
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: Pergamon Press, Inc
Elmsford, NY 10523
US Dept of Justice

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 78-NI-AX-0003
Sale Source: Pergamon Press, Inc
Maxwell House
Fairview Park
Elmsford, NY 10523
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews several definitions and approaches to performance measurement, considers what is involved in making a statement about the effectiveness or performance of a given system, and proposes a new conceptual minmalist position.
Abstract: Most literature on organizational effectiveness is dominated by two main approaches: treating the organization as primarily a purposive goal-seeking entity, or treating it as an open system. The organizational goals approach tries to specify the elements of a single set of performance measures by focusing on the organization's goals. However, official statements of such goals are likely to be vague, may not define what the organization is actually trying to do and may not be available at all. Although senior officials offer clearer goals, they may not always agree, may not propose the only relevant goals, and may withhold information. The systems resource approach has two major drawbacks: reliance on the assumption that competitive processes are operating in the environment and possible misleading results of measures over brief time periods. A conceptual minimalist approach is proposed that makes as few assumptions and identifies as many issues as possible for empirical examination. The only assumptions proposed are that any given complex social system is likely to be evaluated by more than one individual or group, and that each constituency will use some system-relevant information in making their assessment of the system's effectiveness. The term 'performance measure set' is proposed for that set of measures which can be shown to affect a given constituency's assessment. A note and 28 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Evaluation; Evaluation of evaluation; Objectives; Organization studies; Right to treatment; Systems analysis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.