skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 70988 Find in a Library
Title: Prisoners' Right of Access to the Courts - The Impact of the Federal Judiciary on the Texas Department of Corrections
Author(s): J C N Boettner
Date Published: 1976
Page Count: 241
Sponsoring Agency: UMI Dissertation Services
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
Sale Source: UMI Dissertation Services
300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
United States of America
Type: Thesis/Dissertation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Court decisions bearing on inmates' right of court access promulgated by Federal courts having jurisdiction over the Texas Department of Corrections are examined in their impact.
Abstract: Under court decisions, Texas prison officials cannot constitutionally withhold, destroy, or censor legal mail sent or received by inmates. Further, they cannot punish inmates for resorting to legal action, deny them access to materials for legal research, or erect barriers for indigent prisoners. Finally, unless there is an adequate legal assistance program for all kinds of litigation, 'no inmate mutual assistance' rules are unconstitutional. The existence of such court decisions, however, does not mean that inmates will be treated accordingly, since prison officials may not comply with the decisions. In Texas, prison authorities have responded to the decisions by establishing a legal assistance program and sponsoring another, as well as by rescinding the rule prohibiting mutual assistance. On the other hand, inmates contend that the attorneys employed by the Department of Corrections are controlled by and responsible to the prison officials. They also maintain that inmates who frequently file legal petitions, the 'writ-writers,' are harassed, threatened, and abused. Independent evidence shows such allegations are often true. In order to counter evasion tactics by prison administrators and ensure the enforcement of right of access decisions, closer supervision of Texas prisons may be required. Appended are letters and letter excerpts from inmates alleging official interference with their right of access to the courts, samples of inmate-written legal petitions, and characteristics of prison inmates in 25 States as of 1968. A bibliography (ca. 50 references) is provided, and 150 cases are cited. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Access to legal information; Judicial decisions; Prisoner's rights; Texas
Note: University of Texas at Austin - doctoral dissertation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.