skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 72043 Find in a Library
Title: Unionization of Court Employees Has Raised Legal, Practical Questions
Journal: Monthly Labor Review  Volume:102  Issue:8  Dated:(August 1979)  Pages:20-24
Author(s): J H Wex; W S McGee
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 5
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation
Washington, DC 20550
Grant Number: APR 76-84021
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Efforts by judicial employees to organize are discussed; the control of labor-management relations for the courts and the impact of possible strike activity on the administration of justice are highlighted.
Abstract: As of September 1978, court employees had organized to varying degrees in 17 States, and the pace of unionization is expected to increase. While court unionization is a recent occurrence, it is best described as part of the larger public sector unionization issue. The structures and methods of organization for executive branch employees in the States and localities are applied readily to the courts. The impact of judicial unionization has been exerted mainly on the internal operations of the courts and not on general labor-management relations. The trend has forced the courts to become better planners and managers of the resources available to them. Court employees who are statutorily given the right to bargain collectively with their employer face a number of practical problems, including defining the type of unit and number of unit members, determining representation, and articulating demands sought. In general, it appears that court strikes will not mean court closings because in most cases enough supervisory personnel remain available to maintain essential courtroom activities. As more States pass enabling legislation for public sector collective bargaining and as the nationwide 'tax revolt' influences State and local budgets, court employees will seek the advantages of organization for the same reasons as have other public sector employees. Footnotes and exhibits are included in the article. (Author abstract)
Index Term(s): Court personnel; Labor relations; Unions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.