skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 72114 Find in a Library
Title: Empirical Assessment of Neutralization in Control Theories of Deviance
Author(s): J F Sheley
Date Published: 1975
Page Count: 337
Sponsoring Agency: UMI Dissertation Services
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
Sale Source: UMI Dissertation Services
300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
United States of America
Type: Thesis/Dissertation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Results are reported from an empirical test of conflicting theories of deviance advocated by two social control theories.
Abstract: One social control theory examined suggests that persons create their own freedom to deviate through neutralizations or rationalizations of deviant behavior. Neutralizations are ad hoc manipulations of socially acceptable conditions of norm violation which afford the freedom to deviate without denying the validity of the norms in question. The second control theory analyzed (Hirschi, 1969) contends that persons do not create their own freedom to deviate but possess such freedom through weak attachment to conventional others and weak commitment to or belief in social norms prior to an independent of the desire to violate a particular norm. A resolution of these opposing control theories was sought through an examination of cross sectional survey data collected from 1,561 university students. The data gave greater support to Hirschi's social control theory. Variation was found in respondents' attachment and commitment to and belief in the examined social norms, and the variation was linked to differential involvement in self-reported criminal acts. Lack of variation or the failure to relate variation to criminality would have suggested support for neutralization theory. Correspondence was found between the 'justifications' respondents offered for specific deviant acts and related crime-facilitating beliefs, suggesting that neutralizations are not necessary to permit deviance. A concluding summary indicates the need for a reexamination of the neutralization thesis and suggests various avenues of further research into the controversy examined in the study. The study questionnaire is appended; footnotes and 46 tables are provided. The bibliography lists approximately 80 references. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Behavioral science research; Comparative analysis; Deviance; Social control theory
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. University of Massachusetts - doctoral dissertation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.