Skip to main content skip navigation
  • Account
    • Login
    • Manage
  • Subscribe
    • JUSTINFO
    • Register
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact Us
    • Email
    • Feedback
    • Chat
    • Phone or Mail
  • Site Help
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Office of Justice Programs header with links to bureaus/offices: BJA, BJS, NIJ, OJJDP, OVC, SMART Office of Justice Programs BJA BJS NIJ OJJDP OVC SMART Office of Justice Programs
Advanced Search  Search Help
    Browse By Topics  down arrow
  • A–Z Topics
  • Corrections
  • Courts
  • Crime
  • Crime Prevention
  • Drugs
  • Justice System
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Law Enforcement
  • Victims
CrimeSolutions
Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar
  • ABOUT NCJRS
  • OJP PUBLICATIONS
  • LIBRARY
  • SEARCH Q & A
  • GRANTS & FUNDING
  • JUSTICE EVENTS
Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

 

NCJ Number: 72259 Find in a Library
Title: Clinical Evaluation of the 'Dangerousness' of 'Normal' Criminal Defendants
Journal: Virginia Law Review  Volume:66  Issue:3  Dated:(April 1980)  Pages:523-581
Author(s): G E Dix
Date Published: 1980
Annotation: The use of expert mental health opinion regarding the assaultiveness of nonmentally ill criminal defendants is explored; suggestions focusing on appropriate use of such opinion are emphasized.
Abstract: Testimony by psychiatrists and other mental health professionals is used not only in civil commitment cases but also in the sentencing and dispositional stages of many criminal prosecutions. Recent studies indicate that mental health prediction testimony is not based upon any demonstrated ability to predict specific types of conduct. Further, where such testimony involves persons who do not exhibit symptoms of traditional mental illness, there is little merit in the intuitive suggestion that mental health professionals must have extraordinary abilities related to prediction. Such problems, however, do not justify a blanket prohibition of opinion testimony, and on balance the advantages of having sentencing authorities receive opinion testimony outweigh disadvantages, including cost. It is suggested that a mental health professional should be banned from expressing any predictive opinion more specific than that the subject poses a greater than average risk of engaging in future assaultive or otherwise criminal conduct. Testimony concerning a diagnosis of psychopathy when the issue is merely the subject's dangerousness should also be prohibited. Trial judges should thus limit testimony to comparative risk statements for jury trials. For cases heard by the judge alone, expert opinions should be restricted to live, formal testimony, thus eliminating views that would be acceptable in a written report but inadmissible as court testimony. In addition, defendants need to be assured of an opportunity to determine whether reports submitted to the court under the present system contain views exceeding the limitations of comparative risk statements. Finally, defendants should have the opportunity to contest the credibility of opinions expressed by professionals, even if the opinions are within suggested guidelines. Footnotes with references are provided in the article.
Index Term(s): Criminal proceedings; Criminal responsibility; Expert witnesses; Psychiatry; Testimony; Violent offenders
Page Count: 57
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Note: Portions of the article are quotes from the American Psychiatric Association's, 'Diagnostic and Statistical Manual'
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=72259

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.




Find in a Library

You have clicked Find in a Library. A title search of WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click "Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain active for 30 minutes. Learn More.

You have selected:

This article appears in

In WorldCat, verify that the library you select has the specific journal volume and issue in which the article appears. Learn How.

Continue to WorldCat

You are about to access WorldCat, NCJRS takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the WorldCat site.

 
Office of Justice Programs Facebook Page  Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Assistance Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics Twitter Page
  • National Institute of Justice Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office for Victims of Crime Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking Facebook Page Twitter Page
Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers
USA.gov | CrimeSolutions
Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs