skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 72300 Find in a Library
Title: Political Correlates of the Behavior of Federal District Judges - A 'Best Case' Analysis
Journal: Journal of Politics  Volume:40  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1978)  Pages:25-58
Author(s): H M Kritzer
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 34
Sponsoring Agency: Soc for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Ann Arbor, MI 48106
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study focused on the role played by political factors in the exercise of judicial discretion using on analysis of Federal judicial decisions in selected cases.
Abstract: It is hypothesized that political factors may play a large role in the exercise of judicial discretion, but that the cues provided by political factors are highly ambiguous. The research began by identifying a large body of cases for which the political cues are relatively unambiguous; selected cases showed a priori links between the issues raised by the cases and political variables that are independent of the judicial system. A total of 534 cases in which draft resisters were sentenced by Federal district judges during the Vietnam War were analyzed. Analysis focused on five sets of variables: three dealing with the political environment, one dealing with individual judges, and one dealing with case-specific variables, many of which considered major factors in sentencing. Case information included name, location of sentencing, date of sentencing, specific violation, sentence, and judge. Information on the sentencing judges was obtained from such sources as State 'blue books' and personal inquiries. Three different indicators of the dependent variable, sentence, were used in the standardized regression analysis; these included the decision on imprisonment, sentence length, and jail term. Among the local political cultural variables, the innovation index was the best predictor of sentences, Judges in more progressive States gave out more lenient sentences. The longer the tenure of the judge, the more lenient the sentence. Those who awaited trial in jail tended to receive longer sentences. Findings indicated that, in general, environmental variables were the most important correlates of the actions of Federal judges in draft resistance cases. This finding supports the hypothesized significant role of political factors in judicial decisionmaking. Tables and footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Judges; Judicial decisions; Judicial discretion; Political influences; Research; Statistical analysis; Studies
Note: Earlier version of this paper was presented at a meeting of the Southwest Political Science Association, April 7-10, 1976, Dallas, Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.