skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 72390 Find in a Library
Title: Compensation to the Victims of Crime
Journal: Social Defence  Volume:14  Issue:56  Dated:(April 1979)  Pages:5-11
Author(s): D R Singh; D P Jatar
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 7
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: India
Annotation: This article defines victim compensation and reviews the history and current practices of compensation, with an emphasis on compensation in India.
Abstract: Compensation is defined as payment by the State to the victim of a crime or to his dependents to make up for the loss incurred. The British Home Office Working Party emphasizes compensation for the victims of crimes of violence only, whereas the Canadian Correctinal Association refers to compensation to victims of crimes of all kinds. A brief review of the history of compensation traces the idea of compensation back to ancient codes including the Code of Hammurabi, the Mosaic Law, the Penal Code of Solon, and Roman Law. Schafer's 1960 survey of 29 countries classifies current practices of compensation into three categories. Compensation based on damage is civil in character and is awarded in civil proceedings. Restitution is either civil in character but awarded in criminal proceedings or interwoven with penal law and awarded in criminal proceedings. Compensation is either civil in character and awarded in criminal proceedings or neutral in character and awarded through a special procedure. Schafer points out that the principle of compensation for victims is not widespread, and the demand for improvement of the victim's position is neither insistent nor significant in any country. The absence of victim compensation in India's criminal law is emphasized. Payment of compensation to victims of crime is viewed as a social liability, and legislation providing for compensation is advocated. Eighteen references are provided.
Index Term(s): India; Multinational studies; Restitution; Victim compensation
Note: Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of Indian Society of Criminology, February 10-11, 1979, Bangalore (IN)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=72390

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.