skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 72607 Find in a Library
Title: Federal Grand Juries v Attorney Independence and the Attorney-Client Privilege
Journal: Hastings Law Journal  Volume:27  Issue:6  Dated:(July 1976)  Pages:1263-1290
Author(s): M Zwerling
Date Published: 1976
Page Count: 28
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article traces the historical development and purposes of the grand jury system as well as abuses of the Federal grand jury system directed against attorneys during the Nixon administration, and assesses the impact of continued abuses on eroding civil liberties.
Abstract: The grand jury was devised as a means of protecting individual liberty. Since the grand jury has always been perceived as a protector of individual liberty, a judicial attitude of noninterference with grand jury proceedings has developed. This posture of noninterference has allowed abuses of the due process rights of grand jury inquiries to develop as a matter of course, especially since the U.S. Supreme Court has held that grand juries are free from due process concerns. Federal laws enacted in 1968 and 1970 have allowed Federal prosecutors to subvert the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination by imposing immunity on recalcitrant witnesses to gain information which is not supposed to be used in subsequent prosecutions. Significant erosions of individual liberties have also occurred as a result of misuse of grand juries to elicit information from attorneys about their clients that the courts previously considered to be privileged information. The Nixon administration chose to deal with its political enemies who were attorneys by subjecting them to grand jury inquiries and forcing them to reveal information about their clients. The practice continued beyond the Nixon years. Courts have held it permissible for attorneys to reveal names and addresses of clients, as well as information about fee arrangements to grand juries, by claiming that these particular communications are not privileged and that this information will enable courts to establish the existence of clients. Continued use of grand juries for the purpose of forcing attorneys to reveal client information will undermine the conficence of clients in their attorneys and lessen the effectiveness of the adversary system. Judges should vigorously defend the attorney-client privilege when challenges to grand jury authority come before them, as a means of preventing further erosion of civil liberties through misuse of an institution developed to protect them. The article contains 129 case notes.
Index Term(s): Attorney client relations; Attorneys; Grand juries; Indictment; Investigative powers; Political influences
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=72607

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.