skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 72661 Find in a Library
Title: Authoritarianism and Decisions of Mock Juries - Evidence of Jury Bias and Group Polarization
Journal: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  Volume:36  Issue:12  Dated:(December 1978)  Pages:1424-1430
Author(s): R M Bray; A M Noble
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 7
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A mock-jury experiment investigated the effects of authoritarianism on juror and jury decisions and examined the generalizability of the group polarization hypothesis for a simulated jury task.
Abstract: Participants were 280 students enrolled in introductory psychology or sociology classes. A 22-item acquiescence-free version of the F scale (Byrne 1974) was administered to the students to classify participants as either high or low authoritarians. High and low authoritarians listened to a murder trial and then made judgments about guilt and punishment as individuals, as six-person juries, and again after deliberations as individuals. As predicted, both high authoritarian jurors and juries reached guilty verdicts more frequently and imposed more severe punishment than low authoritarians. Further, high authoritarians showed more prediscussion-postdiscussion verdict changes than low authoritarians. Results also supported the polarization hypothesis in a jury paradigm. Deliberations produced a shift toward greater severity of punishment for high authoritarians. Guilt verdicts shifted toward acquittal for all jurors. Implications of these findings are especially strong for trials involving capital punishment, the type of trial where juries containing all high authoritarians would most likely be empaneled. This follows from selection criteria in which capital-trial jurors must indicate their willingness to consider all potential penalties and must not be irrevocably committed before the trial has begun to vote against the death penalty. High authoritarians generally appear to be most favorable toward the death penalty. Several tables, 4 reference notes, and 20 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Attitudes; Behavior patterns; Juror characteristics; Jury decisionmaking; Verdicts
Note: Some of these data were presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, May 1978
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=72661

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.