skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 72851 Find in a Library
Title: Confidentiality - Privacy - Right to Treatment - Right to Refuse (From Mental Health for the Convicted Offender Patient and Prisoner, P 125-147, 1977 - See NCJ-72844)
Author(s): C Smith; S L Brodsky; R L Sadoff; E I Megargee
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 23
Sponsoring Agency: North Carolina Dept of Correction
Raleigh, NC 27603
Sale Source: North Carolina Dept of Correction
840 West Morgan Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Issues related to confidentiality, privacy, and the right to have or refuse treatment are discussed with reference to mental health services for offenders and inmates.
Abstract: Confidentiality and privacy should have high priority in therapeutic relationships with inmates. However, certain matters, such as threats, to the life of another inmate, which cannot be kept confidential by the therapist should be made known to the client prior to therapy. The client should be certain that what is shared with the therapist will not be revealed to others except under terms explained by the therapist. Because clients have the right of access to their confidential records, therapists should only include in written records what they do not mind the client seeing. At the very least, offenders and inmates have the right to expect that the level of mental health existing at the time of conviction will not be damaged by the correctional experience. Although mental health services should not be forced on offenders who do not desire treatment, treatment should be of such a high quality that those who choose it have a right to expect benefits from it. The issue of privacy regarding classification testing and evaluation has not been seriously confronted. Privacy rights would seem to dictate offender choice in such matters. Also, where treatment programs are being evaluated by using control groups, the question must be asked whether the control subjects are being denied the right to the treatment received by the experimental subjects. Excerpts from the workshop discussion of these issues are provided.
Index Term(s): Confidential records access; Inmate Programs; Inmates as research subjects; Mental health services; Prisoner's rights; Privileged communications; Right of privacy; Right to treatment
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.