skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73035 Find in a Library
Title: Effect of Victim's Need and Previous Accusation of Theft Upon Bystander's Reaction to Theft
Journal: Journal of Social Psychology  Volume:112  Dated:(October 1980)  Pages:41-49
Author(s): W A Harrell; J W Goltz
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 9
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A field experiment analyzed the effects of victim neediness, false accusations of stealing, and numbers of thieves on bystander reactions to thefts in a university library.
Abstract: Several studies which have explored the relationship between victims and bystanders are reviewed briefly. For this experiment male and female university students studying alone in the library were subjected unknowingly to various test situations conducted by four teams of six undergraduates each. Some students were wrongfully accused of taking books prior to observing a theft, others were permitted to overhear a conversation between a victim and a friend indicating financial problems or lack of such problems before witnessing the theft of the victim's calculator. Some bystanders were told that books were missing but they were not accused personally, and two thieves were used in some situations. Observers scored bystander reactions according to active intervention in the theft, such as reporting it to the victim, or lack of involvement. All subjects who intervened or reported the theft were informed immediately about the experiments. Data on 80 bystanders were selected for the final analysis which indicated that individuals were more likely to intervene in a theft if the victim was impoverished rather than prosperous. Subjects who had been accused of theft were more likely to help than those not accused, possibly to prove their honesty. There was a slight tendency for more helping to occur when there was only one thief. Neediness of the victim had a greater effect on females than males. This could be attributed to a greater sensitivity to distress in others by women of Western society and more empathy because most victims in the experiment were women. Since research has shown that bystander responses tend to depend on the situation, further study is needed to discover if these findings are applicable to other populations and settings. The bibliography lists 19 references.
Index Term(s): Theft offenses; Victimology; Witness intervention in crime
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.