skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73113 Find in a Library
Title: Risk Screening in the Connecticut Office of Adult Probation Evaluation
Corporate Author: New England Management Services, Inc
United States of America
Project Director: J O Sullivan
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 215
Sponsoring Agency: Connecticut Judicial Dept
Hartford, CT 06114
National Institute of Corrections
Washington, DC 20534
New England Management Services, Inc
New Haven, CT 06510
Grant Number: AX-O
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report evaluates a method developed and implemented in Connecticut for screening offenders to determine their risk to the community and the resulting level of probation supervision needed.
Abstract: The method was implemented by the Connecticut Department of Adult Probation (CDAP) in 1977. The program, entitled Differential Caseload Management of Objectives (DCMBO), provided a uniform system and policy of case assessment and differentiated supervision. The screening tool used six criteria which were separated into a Criminal Index and a Behavioral and Environmental Adjustment Index. By February 1, 1979, the program had processed about 33,000 offenders. The present evaluation's goals were to validate the risk predictive instrument, improve reliability of case screening data, evaluate program effectiveness, compare case outcomes among 29 probation field units, and conduct two statewide staff workshops. Evaluation data were collected by means of interviews and from official records. Data indicated that the DCMBO system has effectively identified the low risk segment of the offender population. The program has also successfully allocated resources and improved service delivery. Specific refinements in the system's scoring scale and operating methods are recommended to enhance the system's functional operation and its predictive accuracy. A literature review and descriptions of the two workshops are included. Tables, figures, and forms are also included. Appendixes present the case screening instrument, examples of cases, and related materials.
Index Term(s): Connecticut; Evaluation; Inmate lawsuits; Probation or parole decisionmaking; Program evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.