skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73169 Find in a Library
Title: Avoiding Failure in Probation Reform - Seeking Judicial Input and Evaluation
Journal: Journal of Probation and Parole  Volume:12  Dated:(Fall 1980)  Pages:43-54
Author(s): R Handberg
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Florida Council on Crime and Delinquency
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Results are reported from a survey of Florida judges to determine their assessment of the current probation system and the likelihood of their suport for an improved and expanded system.
Abstract: Efforts at probation reform often fail because they lack support from judges. Circuit court judges in Florida were mailed a questionnaire which was designed to determine the level of support that could be expected from judges in using an expanded and improved probation system. Results showed that the judges were generally positive toward the probation system, particularly in areas where they had personal contact with it. Further, the judges showed an openness to using an improved probation system, particularly for offenders convicted of nonviolent crimes. The survey results strongly indicated that probation reform efforts could succeed, since judges showed a willingness to use probation more in sentencing, provided the quality of supervision and the services provided were good. Tabular data and footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Correctional planning; Correctional reform; Florida; Judges; Probation; Sentencing/Sanctions; Surveys
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.