skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73174 Find in a Library
Title: Redirecting Social Studies of Law
Journal: Law and Society Review  Volume:14  Issue:3  Dated:(Spring 1980)  Pages:805-829
Author(s): R L Abel
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 25
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The general direction of the social studies of law is critiqued under the topics of legal institutions, the functions of law, and the values served by law.
Abstract: Under the topic of legal institutions, the social study directions examined relate to the legal profession, courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, juries, extrajudicial dispute processing, and administrative agencies. Social studies bearing upon the functions of law in society are reviewed under criminal law and civil law. Social studies dealing with law and ultimate values are explored under the issues of equality and legitimacy. The cumulative effect of the various social study directions has been to define the central questions for sociolegal studies as 'effectiveness' and 'justice.' Although these are the appropriate issues, studies have generally formulated them in the wrong ways. Effectiveness has been construed in a narrowly instrumental fashion as an examination of whether the declared goals of a law or legal institution (usually one that is new or reformed) have been attained. Since declared goals are never attained, studies should focus more realistically on the inadvertent consequences or symbolic meanings of legal institutions and laws, the costs, the person for whom laws work, and the fundamental structural reasons why they do not work. Justice has been correctly identified with equality, but the objects of scrutiny, highly visible official processes, are too limited. The focus should be expanded to include low-visibility behavior, such as facilitative uses of law, and the contribution of the legal system to the maintenance of substantive inequalities in the larger society should be analyzed. References and notes are not included.
Index Term(s): Administrative adjudication; Attorneys; Civil proceedings; Criminal codes; Critiques; Dispute processing; Juries; Legal research; Social organization; US Supreme Court
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.