skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 73527 Find in a Library
Title: Indirect Costs of the Social Security Administration's Disability Programs Are Excessive and Should Be Reduced
Corporate Author: US Comptroller General
United States of America
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 21
Sponsoring Agency: Azimuth Inc.
Fairmont, WV 26554
US Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548
Sale Source: Azimuth Inc.
1000 Technology Drive, Suite 3120
Fairmont, WV 26554
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A 1978 General Accounting Office (GAO) review of six States found that the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (DHEW) was paying more that its appropriate share of the indirect costs incurred in making disability decisions under the Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income programs.
Abstract: Eligibility for benefits from both programs is determined by State agencies called Disability Determination Services which are totally funded by the Federal Government. Indirect costs for administration, purchasing, accounting, budgeting, and space are not readily assignable to a particular grant but can be calculated in two ways: cost allocation plans which identify all costs not chargeable to the Federal Government and distribute them to beneficiary State agencies and indirect cost proposals which convert all unidentified costs to a percentage rate and apply that to Federal grants. In response to a congressional request, these reimbursement mechanisms were examined in Arkansas, California, Colorado, New York, Ohio, and Texas which together accounted for about 55 percent of the programs' total indirect costs for 1978. State and Federal officials responsible for negotiating and establishing indirect cost charges were interviewed. In California, Colorado, New York, and Texas, the GAO estimated that disability programs were overcharged at least $645,000 in indirect costs. Another $570,000 could have been saved if New York and California had used a more equitable method of allocating indirect costs. GAO found that DHEW negotiators do not adequately analyze the propriety of indirect costs and have few contacts with the responsible State officials. DHEW headquarters does not effectively monitor the negotiation process to ensure that no excessive indirect costs are being applied to the disability programs. Furthermore, Social Security Administration (SSA) officials do not understand indirect cost principles and do not assist DHEW in identifying improper charges. Improvements in DHEW's negotiating and monitoring procedures and more SSA participation in the negotiation process could reduce costs. Specifically, DHEW negotiators should verify that services paid for are actually are benefiting the programs and determine that States are using the most equitable formula for allocating indirect costs. The official requests for the GAO review is appended. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Cost analysis; Federal programs; Income maintenance programs; Persons with Disabilities; Program abuse; Social Security Act; State aid; US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; US Government Accountability Office (GAO); Welfare services
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=73527

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.