skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73544 Find in a Library
Title: Correctional Facilities
Journal: Architectural Record  Volume:163  Issue:7  Dated:(June 1978)  Pages:125-140
Author(s): Anonymous
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 16
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Examples of recently constructed correctional facilities which attempt to incorporate features that provide for security and are humane are illustrated.
Abstract: One of the most significant developments in the area of prison design has been the intervention of the Federal courts in demanding facilities that are both humane and secure. In some instances, the State legislatures' compliance has resulted in interesting challenges for architects in defining what 'humane' should mean in the context of facility design. It is often defined as a static imitation of middle-class lifestyle, with furniture and windows that recall real houses in a superficial way. Often, however, the resulting environment is merely new in tone, lacking the traditional symbols of incarceration but creating new and subtle ones of its own. Another solution has been to produce smaller facilities located in the center of large towns and cities close to families, professional resources, and employment opportunities. Some communities have regarded these facilities as worthwhile assets. Photographs and brief descriptions of the following facilities illustrate some recent solutions to design problems: the Washtenaw County Corrections/Law Enforcement Center in Michigan; the Ramsey County Detention Center in Minnesota; the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center; the Foley Square Courthouse Annex in New York City; and the Lexington Assessment and Reception Facility in Oklahoma. In addition, the Mendocino County Detention Center and Justice Court in California and the Federal Correctional Facility in Butner, N.C. are illustrated. Floor plans for most of the facilities are included.
Index Term(s): Architectural design; Correctional facilities; Correctional reform; Environmental design; Human factors engineering; Prison construction; Space management
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.