skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 73622 Find in a Library
Title: Teamwork in Probation - Prospects and Implications
Journal: Social Work Today  Volume:9  Issue:36  Dated:(1978)  Pages:12-14
Author(s): D Millard
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 3
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: The concept of probation officers working together in teams and the implications of teamwork for organizational change in the British probation service are discussed.
Abstract: The 'teamwork' concept in the field of probations views each officer as a member of a work group or team. The team as a whole is responsible to one senior officer and a pool of resources to be differentially employed. While one or two officers in a team would still be solely engaged in traditional counseling tasks, others would work on special tasks, such as setting up day centers and housing associations or running a team of volunteers. The development of the teamwork concept can be traced to various sources among which the dissatisfaction with traditional one-to-one service methods is probably foremost. In the framework of the new approach, the client is considered as an autonomous individual who, among other possible choices, has chosen deviance and who needs assistance in selecting better options. Emphasizing the clients' self-responsibility, the probation order would include two distinctive dmensions: specific probation obligations which the client is obligated to fulfill and an optional rehabilitation program with a wide range of opportunities. The question is whether the British probation service will be able to adjust to the organizational implications of teamwork: the need for greater autonomy if a team is to respond quickly and effectively and the ensuing problem of accountability. The article suggests a case committee system in which each team is responsible to a local committee. Jointly the probation officers team and the committee would be accountable for the correct discharge of the recommendations imposed by the probation agency. The article includes bibliographical footnotes.
Index Term(s): Probation or parole agencies; Probation or parole officers; Probation or parole subsidy; Probationers; Team treatment; United Kingdom (UK)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=73622

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.