skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73952 Find in a Library
Title: Extradition of Terrorists
Journal: Revue de science criminelle et de droit penal compare  Issue:3  Dated:(July-September 1980)  Pages:661-691
Author(s): J Borricand
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 31
Format: Article
Language: French
Country: France
Annotation: The theoretical basis for extradition of terrorists and the acts for which particular persons may be extradited are discussed in detail.
Abstract: While most national and international treaties admit to the need to extradite terrorists, the treaties define 'terrorists' so diversely that uniform practices are impossible. The definition of terrorists is crucial because political prisoners have long enjoyed a special status in the international community and extradition of terrorists is frequently refused on the grounds that they are political refugees. Extradition agreements are designed to assure the protection of the separate states and of individuals from such offenses as air piracy and violent criminal acts against life and limb. However, existing agreements do not permit generalization of the extradition rule because of the wide range of exceptions possible for 'political offenders.' To resolve the difficulties, the relationship between terrorism and political offenses must be more clearly defined. Solutions proposed are 1) to establish a category of partially political offenses which may or may not warrant extradition, 2) to reject terrorism as a political offense and place it in the category of regular offenses, and 3) to give terrorists special status taking into considerations the specificity of terrorist actions. At the present time, extradition in cases of terrorist acts depends on the seriousness of the act and whether the act fits into the list of recognized terrorist activities. This list includes airplane hijacking, offenses against individuals protected by diplomatic immunity, hostage taking, offenses involving bombs or automatic weapons, and severe property damage while performing an act seriously dangerous to human lives. Persons subject to extradition in existing treaties are individuals know to have commited acts of international terrorism, to have attempted to commit acts of international terrorism, or to have aided and abetted terrorist acts, at least in some cases. Most states, except for Great Britain and the United States refuse to extradite nationals. This is regrettable, because criminals can escape by becoming citizens of countries without extradition agreements, prompting the countries seeking extradition to resort to illegal practices to gain custody of the criminal. The most immediate means of facilitating extradition of terrorists is for separate states to ratify existing conventions and for the separate states to cooperate in bringing their internal laws on extradition into agreement. Extensive notes are supplied.
Index Term(s): Anti-Hijacking conventions; International agreements; International cooperation; International extradition; International law; Nonextradition of nationals; Political offender nonextradition; Political offenders; Terrorist tactics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.