skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 73992 Find in a Library
Title: Widening the Net - An Anomaly in the Evaluation of Diversion Programs (From Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation, P 572-592, 1980, Malcolm W Klein and Katherine S Teilmann, ed. - See NCJ-73970)
Author(s): T G Blomberg
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 21
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications, Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Sale Source: Sage Publications, Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The viewpoint that many criminal justice system diversion programs have side effects that are seldom considered in narrowly focused evaluation designs is expressed.
Abstract: The increasing use of diversion programs as alternatives to the institutionalization of both adult and juvenile offenders is having the side effect of widening the net of social control by criminal justice personnel to the families of diversion's targeted clients through family-oriented treatment programs. When the families of the targeted clients, especially their siblings, are unable or unwilling to cooperate, the attention of criminal justice personnel is called to behaviors that would otherwise have escaped notice. On the other hand, adult offenders referred to diversion programs who are unable to meet the program requirements are subject to informal double jeopardy; they are returned for prosecution on their original charges, prosecuted vigorously, convicted, and placed on probation supervision. Diversionary powers encourage members of the criminal justice establishment to place individuals into the system, especially juveniles, who would otherwise be left out as borderline cases. Juvenile clients' perception of the differences between diversion and incarceration as reported in a 1979 study by Paternoster is mixed. The majority of diversion's targeted clients feel that diversion involves stigma and social liabilities similar to those of incarceration. Since diversion programs are administratively controlled by the official justice system, staffed by justice personnel, and physically based in official justice premises, they are a supplementary rather than alternative function to the justice system. Evaluators of diversion programs must differentiate between proper (system insertable) diversion clients and net-widening clients (noninsertable subjects). They must also be aware that diversion programs are increasingly widening their net to include whole families of diversion's targeted clients. Therefore, they develop capacities in this area, using self-report measures to explore family reactions to treatment experiences. Evaluators can play an increasing role in shaping correctional policy decisionmaking by contributing to the scrutiny and accountability of diversion programs to help eliminate ineffective and socially dangerous ones. Explanatory endnotes and 120 references are appended.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; Diversion programs; Evaluation measures; Evaluation techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.