skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 74357 Find in a Library
Title: Law Reform and Rape Under the Tasmanian Criminal Code (From Rape Law Reform, P 49-65, 1980, Jocelynne A Scutt, ed. - See NCJ-74354)
Author(s): W J E Cox
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 17
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Institute of Criminology
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601,
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: The legal provisions with regard to rape under the Criminal Code of the Australian State of Tasmania are examined, and suggestions for reform are made.
Abstract: According to Tasmanian court decisions, rape involves the following essential ingredients: (1) that intentional penetration occurs, (2) that the female victim is not married to the offender, and (3) that the female victim did not consent to the act. The offender's honest and reasonable belief that the victim was consenting is considered a fact of exculpation or defense. Problems arising in relation to the actus reus of rape include the definition of 'carnal knowledge' and of 'consent,' and the lack of provisions with regard to a belated withdrawal of consent by the victim. Under the Tasmanian Criminal Code, spouse rape is only subject to punishment if it involves violence, unnatural carnal knowledge, or indecency. In addition to rape provisions, the code also provides against 'indecent assault'--an assault by a male upon a female accompanied by circumstances which to the juries' mind are indecent. Because of the greater flexibility in punishment, indecent assault may be used as an alternative conviction to the indictment of rape. As a result of the study the following reforms of the code are suggested: (1) abolishment of rape as a separate offense, (2) inclusion of rape within the offense of indecent assault, (3) requirement that the accused establish the existence of reasonable grounds for assuming the victim's consent, (4) a broader definition of consent, (5) the extension of criminal liability to persons of both sexes for indecently assaulting their spouse, and (6) extension of the judge's sentencing discretion. The article includes 37 bibliographical notes and footnotes. For related papers, see NCJ 74354.
Index Term(s): Australia; Law reform; LEAA required state plans; Rape; Sex offenses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.