skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 74650 Find in a Library
Title: Tax Fraud
Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:18  Issue:2  Dated:(Fall 1980)  Pages:298-307
Author(s): E S Dickstein; L E Forbes
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 10
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A discussion of Federal income tax evasion statutes examines the elements of the crime, distinguishes felonies from misdemeanors, and highlights defenses.
Abstract: Section 7201 of the U.S. tax code assigns felony status to attempts to evade or defeat tax payment. Tax evasion comprises willful evasion of tax payments due, and the government must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt to convict an offender. Tax deficiency may be proved by showing that the taxpayer underreported income by a substantial amount. Various methods of proof may be used, including the net worth, bank deposit, and cash expenditures methods. When tax deficiency is shown to exist by the Government, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the government must prove an attempt to evade or defeat payment to support a conviction for felonious evasion. Mere willful neglect of the duty to pay taxes is a misdemeanor. Such neglect would include failure to file returns or keep records, while felonious activities consist of willfully concealing income. In felonious evasion, proof of willfulness is largely inferential, resting upon the allegation of tax deficiency together with direct evidence of conduct indicating an attempt to evade payment. Defenses for tax evasion charges include placing blame on a third party who has prepared the tax return; however, such attempts frequently backfire. However, the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and defendant allegations of selective prosecution are not acceptable defenses. Finally, IRS investigators need not give Miranda warnings, although IRS regulations explicitly inform the taxpayer, in a noncustodial interview of the criminal nature of the investigation, of the taxpayer's right to refuse to answer questions and of the taxpayer's right to counsel. Footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Internal revenue laws; Tax evasion; White collar crime
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=74650

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.