skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 74971 Find in a Library
Title: Death Penalty Referendum in Oregon, 1964 - Some Notes from a Participant-Observer
Journal: Crime and Delinquency  Volume:26  Issue:4  Dated:(October 1980)  Pages:528-536
Author(s): H A Bedau
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 9
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: An account of the successful 1964 referendum to abolish the death penalty in Oregon illustrates the abolitionist movement's greatest success and the campaign leading up to the victory.
Abstract: The strategy adopted by the Oregon Council to Abolish the Death Penalty included organizing a statewide abolition group; mobilizing support from allied organizations; designing a mass media campaign, especially for the populous region around Portland; and arranging radio and television discussions and spot announcements late in the campaign. Other strategies included preparing research papers on the death penalty for use as press releases and speakers' notes, holding a national conference at a local college, and encouraging sermons in the churches statewide to explore the religious and moral aspects of the death penalty. Opposition to the council's activities was infrequent and unorganized, yet the campaign's success remains difficult to explain. Defeat of the death penalty at the polls in that particular election was probably owing to an unusual combination of factors, making it difficult if not impossible to duplicate the results elsewhere. For example, victory at the polls may have been helped by the timing of the election (held during a presidential election), the growing number of young voters, and the concentration of funds in the State's most populous county. Footnotes are included. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Oregon; Political influences; Referendums
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=74971

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.