skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 75120 Find in a Library
Title: Is Experimental Design Constitutional? (From Criminal Justice Research, 1980, P 17-35, Barbara R Price and Phyllis J Baunach, ed. - See NCJ-75119)
Author(s): B Latzer; M P Kirby
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications, Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Sale Source: Sage Publications, Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Arguments for and against experiments in evaluating criminal justice programs or services are presented and strategies for planning criminal justice experiments are discussed.
Abstract: Arguments against experiments include violations of nonparticipants' rights by denying them equal access to treatment, the legality of government involvement in research activities, and the arbitrariness of random selection. In rebuttal, it is contended that the criminal justice system has no obligation to provide services to everyone and therefore excluding some persons from treatment programs is legal. Furthermore, in those cases where the experiment has no positive value, the nonparticipants are not being denied any beneficial exposure. It is important that government agencies be able to measure the value of programs and services to prevent waste. Random selection is used because it avoids discrimination on the basis of subject traits. Differences in the treatment of participants and nonparticipants in experimental conditions are generally not excessive and do not usually last for extended periods of time; thus, the principle of like treatment for like case is not violated. In the past, there have been no successful cases of suits based on discrimination during criminal justice experiments and it is unlikely that such a case will be mounted. Researchers wishing to adopt experimental designs in the face of objections should become familiar with legal defenses of the experimental method, should demonstrate sensitivity to the issue, and should enlist the support of those who have cooperated with research efforts in the past. Thirty-three court cases are cited and fourteen references are provided.
Index Term(s): Behavioral science research; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Evaluation techniques; Human research subject protection; Lawsuits; Program evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=75120

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.