skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 75678 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Law Enforcement on Indian Reservations After Oliphant v Suquamish Indian Tribe - An Identification of the Problems and Recommendations for Remedies
Author(s): A T Skibine; M B Oliviero
Corporate Author: Institute for the Development of Indian Law, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 218
Sponsoring Agency: Institute for the Development of Indian Law, Inc
Washington, DC 20005
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 78-NI-AX-0121
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report examines the problems created by the 1978 Supreme Court decision in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe which ruled that Indian tribes cannot exercise criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians for crimes committed on the reservation.
Abstract: To assess the jurisdictional void on Indian reservations following the Supreme Court decision, this project first reviewed Indian treaties, legislative policies in the 19th and 20th centuries, and executive branch opinions on non-Indian jurisdiction. Case law was examined to determine the validity of the Court's assumption that tribal criminal justice over non-Indians was inconsistent with their tribal status. The study concluded that the denial of tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians is a political question that should be resolved by Congress, not the courts. Information on the law enforcement difficulties encountered by tribes since 1978 was collected through visits to 12 reservations and questionnaires sent to over 200 active tribal governments. Analysis of this data indicated that the Oliphant decision has created serious gaps in law enforcement on reservations with non-Indian populations. Because most reservations have ceased all criminal enforcement against non-Indians and no other agency has assumed responsibility for these crimes, unregulated non-Indian crime has increased, particularly traffic offenses. The tribal justice systems have become confused, and tribal police morale is low. Economic problems have resulted from the loss of fines and Federal subsidies for tribal police. Short-term remedies adopted by tribes include cross-deputization of tribal police as county or State officers, recodification of certain criminal offenses as civil offenses, and treaty provisions which exclude non-Indians from the reservation. The report proposes that the Secretary of the Interior recognize tribal jurisdiction over non-Indian crimes committed on the reservation on the basis of individual tribe petition. Legislation could allow non-Indians to appeal a tribal court decision to Federal magistrates, Federal district court, or an Indian circuit court. Agreements with county and State authorities could provide temporary relief to jurisdictional problems. The appendixes contain the project's quarterly reports to LEAA and the survey questionnaire. Footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions; Jurisdiction; Reservation crimes; Reservation law enforcement; Tribal court system; US Supreme Court
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.